Response

Yes, a legal notice can be through e-mail. However, it is advisable to send a copy of the Legal Notice to the addressee via a registered post or courier as well.

Emails can be used as admissible evidence in a court of law if they’re found to be authentic. Once they fit the criteria, the emails can be treated as legal documents. This gives the judge the capacity to subpoena all emails if they are a part of an ongoing legal matter.Many people consider email to be an informal form of communication. The Sec 10A of Information Technologies Act provides the legislative authority to electronic contract.It was inserted through an amendment in 2008.E-mail records can be admissible as evidence in courts under the Indian Evidence Act. Hence issue of an offer or acceptance via mails can give rise to binding contracts and these electronic records can be used an evidence in courts to enforce the contracts.

Contracts often require “written notice” to advise the other party of a claim for additional compensation or time. With the routine use of electronic mail, the question has arisen whether an email can suffice. Many states now recognize the enforceability of electronic signatures and several courts now require nothing but electronic filings. Thus, it would seem natural that an email should constitute “written notice.” However, as with most things in the Law – it depends.
The starting point for answering this question begins with the contract itself. Clearly, if email “written notice” is expressly allowed or prohibited, determining the answer is easy – follow the contract. Often, though, the contract is silent as to the form and substance of the written notice to be provided. In that situation, the answer is not so clear cut, but a broad trend appears to be emerging through various courts. First, the sender must have some way of confirming that the email was “received.” Attempted delivery does not suffice. Of course, a reply by the other party (whether by email, letter or some other form) proves receipt. But when no reply is received, the sender will need to demonstrate that the intended recipient actually received the email. No case has yet been found addressing whether the “delivery” and “read” receipt options in Microsoft Outlook will satisfy proof of receipt, but it is only a matter of time before a court does.

Second, the intent and substance of the email should be clear to the recipient. Again, a reply which directly addresses the substance of the email would appear to be the “proof” required. Several courts have declined to find that an email satisfied the written notice requirements in a contract; not because an email cannot constitute a “writing,” but rather the email was vague, unclear or did not truly place the other party on notice. Had the emails in those cases clearly set forth their intended purpose, the courts likely would have come to a different conclusion. Thus, “best practices” would say, “title the email as ‘Written Notice of __’.”

Reference:

202100120202100245409

LAWAYZ-2023-638